Parent-Child Duplicate Sunday Aft Session November 2, 2014
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   48.0      Section  C  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  7   77.98   74.86  B   1     1           1     1          1.17(OA) Michael Hu - Linzhi Hu
  5   62.50   60.00  B   2     2           3     2          0.74(OB) Metin Gokcen - Kutay Gokcen
  4   53.57   51.43  A   3                 4                0.49(OA) David Wheeler - Cameron Wheeler
  1   52.98   50.86  A                                               Kevin Rosenberg - Judy Zuckerberg
  3   52.98   50.86  C               1           3     1    0.76(OC) Olivia D'Arezzo - Carol Swenson
  6   38.69   37.14  B                                               Jennifer Stern - Michelle Pugh
  8   33.33   32.00  C                                               Thanaya Ramji - Chitra Swaminathan
  2   27.98   26.86  C                                               Clement Tang - Calix Tang

Parent-Child Duplicate Sunday Aft Session November 2, 2014
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   48.0      Section  C  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      Overall Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C     A     B     C
  7   65.10   62.50  A   1                 2                0.88(OA) Matthew Shi - Jun Shi
  1   53.13   51.00  A   2                 5                0.37(OA) Bo Xiao - Rory Xiao
  6   52.60   50.50  C   3     1     1           4     2    0.57(OC) Karina Lipe - Gary (James) Lipe
  2   50.00   48.00  A                                               Suzanne Campbell - William Campbell
  5   46.35   44.50  C         2     2                 3    0.43(OC) Violet Tivol - Marcy Tivol
  4   44.79   43.00  C                                               Jonathan Shi - Robin Li
  3   38.02   36.50  C                                               Miller Geschke - John Geschke

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
9 5 3
4
K Q 8 7 5 2
A 5 4
K Q 8 7 4
A Q 10 7 2
10 4
6
N
WE
S
A J 10 6
K 3
9 6 3
K J 7 2
2
J 9 8 6 5
A J
Q 10 9 8 3

EW 4; EW 2; NS 2; NS 2; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N31106.000.007-Hu-Hu vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 W−1504.501.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
4 E−1504.501.506-Stern-Pugh vs 4-Shi-Li
2 E31402.004.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 W31402.004.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 W31402.004.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 7-Shi-Shi
4 E44200.006.002-Tang-Tang vs 3-Geschke-Geschke

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
10 8 5 2
9 6 5
Q 10 8 4
6 4
A K J 9
4
K J 9 5 3 2
K Q
N
WE
S
Q 7
A Q J 10 3 2
7 6
10 8 7
6 4 3
K 8 7
A
A J 9 5 3 2

EW 4; EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−31505.500.503-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 NTW−31505.500.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
4 E−1504.002.002-Tang-Tang vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
3 E31402.503.501-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 E31402.503.507-Hu-Hu vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 E41701.005.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 7-Shi-Shi
3 NTW54600.006.006-Stern-Pugh vs 4-Shi-Li

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 10 7
9 2
8 6 5 2
10 9 2
8 2
K Q 10
K J 10 4
7 6 5 3
N
WE
S
A K 9 3
A 8 5 4 3
Q 9
A 4
6 5 4
J 7 6
A 7 3
K Q J 8

EW 5; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−11005.500.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
4 E−11005.500.506-Stern-Pugh vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
3 E52004.002.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 NTE46303.003.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 4-Shi-Li
4 E56501.504.507-Hu-Hu vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
4 E56501.504.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 7-Shi-Shi
3 NTW56600.006.002-Tang-Tang vs 2-Campbell-Campbell

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A 9
4
Q 10 9 8 6 2
8 5 3 2
7 5 3
Q J 10 5 2
K J 7
A J
N
WE
S
10 6 4
A 9 8 6 3
5
K 7 6 4
K Q J 8 2
K 7
A 4 3
Q 10 9

NS 2; EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−22005.001.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 4-Shi-Li
4 W−22005.001.006-Stern-Pugh vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
4 W−22005.001.007-Hu-Hu vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
4 W−11001.504.502-Tang-Tang vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
3 W−11001.504.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 W−11001.504.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
4 W−11001.504.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 9 8 4 2
A 10 9 8 5
Q J
5
Q 7 3
K 7 4
10 8 5 3
9 6 2
N
WE
S
A 10 6
6
A K 9 6 2
A 10 8 4
K 5
Q J 3 2
7 4
K Q J 7 3

NS 3; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par +100: EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41706.000.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 7-Shi-Shi
2 N31405.001.007-Hu-Hu vs 4-Shi-Li
2 E2904.002.006-Stern-Pugh vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
2 E31103.003.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
2 N−22002.004.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
4 ×N−25000.505.502-Tang-Tang vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
4 ×N−25000.505.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
K J 5
10 8 4 3 2
A 10 4
K J
Q 10 4
A K 9 7
Q J 9 8 3
2
N
WE
S
A 9 3 2
Q J
K 7 6
10 7 6 3
8 7 6
6 5
5 2
A Q 9 8 5 4

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; NS 2; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−33006.000.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 S31105.001.007-Hu-Hu vs 4-Shi-Li
3 S−1503.502.502-Tang-Tang vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 S−1503.502.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 NTE21202.004.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
2 W41301.005.006-Stern-Pugh vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
2 W31400.006.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
Q J 5
A J 9 7 5
A J 9
J 8
K 9 6 4
4 3 2
Q 6
K Q 9 5
N
WE
S
A 10 7 3
6
K 7 2
A 10 4 3 2
8 2
K Q 10 8
10 8 5 4 3
7 6

EW 4; EW 4; NS 2; EW 1N; NS 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41706.000.007-Hu-Hu vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
2 N21105.001.006-Stern-Pugh vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 N−11003.003.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 N−11003.003.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
3 N−11003.003.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
2 E41301.005.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 4-Shi-Li
2 W41700.006.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 9 7 6 4
Q 5 4
Q 10 4
A 6
J 3
9 7 3 2
A 9 2
10 8 7 3
N
WE
S
Q
10 6
K 8 6 5 3
K Q 9 5 2
A K 8 5 2
A K J 8
J 7
J 4

NS 5; NS 4N; NS 4; EW 2; EW 2; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S64806.000.007-Hu-Hu vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
4 S54503.502.503-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
4 S54503.502.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 4-Shi-Li
4 N54503.502.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 7-Shi-Shi
5 S54503.502.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
4 S44200.505.501-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 S44200.505.506-Stern-Pugh vs 1-Xiao-Xiao

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
9 3 2
A J 8 4
8 7 5 3
8 3
K Q 10 7 6 5
10 5
K
A K 9 4
N
WE
S
8 4
K 7 6 3 2
A J 10
7 5 2
A J
Q 9
Q 9 6 4 2
Q J 10 6

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; EW 3; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S−21006.000.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
1 W31405.001.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 4-Shi-Li
3 S−31504.002.007-Hu-Hu vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
2 W41702.503.501-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
2 W41702.503.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
1 W52001.005.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
4 W56500.006.002-Tang-Tang vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 8 5 3 2
K J 6 4 3
Q 9
3
K J 7 4
Q 10 9 7
10 7 3 2
5
N
WE
S
9 6
A 5
K 5 4
A Q 9 8 6 4
Q 10
8 2
A J 8 6
K J 10 7 2

NS 2; NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×S37306.000.007-Hu-Hu vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
3 E−33005.001.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
2 E−22003.502.503-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
2 N52003.502.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
2 N31402.004.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 NTE−11001.005.002-Tang-Tang vs 7-Shi-Shi
2 E2900.006.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 4-Shi-Li

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
8 6 4
A 10 8
A J 8
Q 10 4 3
3
K Q 6 4 3
K 9 7 2
7 6 5
N
WE
S
K J 7 2
9 7 5 2
5 4 3
K 2
A Q 10 9 5
J
Q 10 6
A J 9 8

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 7; NS 5; NS 2; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64906.000.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 4-Shi-Li
4 S64804.501.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
4 S64804.501.507-Hu-Hu vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
4 S44203.003.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
5 N54002.004.002-Tang-Tang vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 S31401.005.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
4 S−1500.006.006-Stern-Pugh vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
J 10 9 8
J 7
Q
A Q 10 6 4 3
Q 7 5 3 2
6 5 4
10 9 7
K 2
N
WE
S
6
K 10 3
K J 5 4 2
J 8 7 5
A K 4
A Q 9 8 2
A 8 6 3
9

NS 5; NS 4N; NS 4; NS 5; NS 2; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ×W−614006.000.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
3 NTS56605.001.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 NTN46303.502.501-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 4-Shi-Li
3 NTS46303.502.507-Hu-Hu vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
2 S21102.004.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
3 S−11001.005.006-Stern-Pugh vs 7-Shi-Shi
3 NTS−22000.006.002-Tang-Tang vs 6-Lipe-Lipe

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A Q 7 5
Q 5 2
K Q 8 7 3
6
J 3
K 9 6 3
A 10
A Q J 8 3
N
WE
S
K 10 9 4
J 7
J 2
K 7 5 4 2
8 6 2
A 10 8 4
9 6 5 4
10 9

EW 4; EW 1N; EW 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−33006.000.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 4-Shi-Li
2 NTW−11005.001.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
2 W31104.002.002-Tang-Tang vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 W41302.503.504-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
2 E41302.503.506-Stern-Pugh vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
3 W61701.005.008-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
1 NTW41800.006.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 7-Shi-Shi

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
Q 8 6 4
A J 4 3
A 5
7 6 2
A K 9 7 5
Q 10 9 6
9 4
8 3
N
WE
S
2
K
K 8 7 6 3
A Q 10 9 5 4
J 10 3
8 7 5 2
Q J 10 2
K J

EW 2N; EW 3; EW 2; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−31505.500.501-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
3 NTE−31505.500.503-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 7-Shi-Shi
3 E−1504.002.004-Wheeler-Wheeler vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 E31103.003.006-Stern-Pugh vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 E41302.004.002-Tang-Tang vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
2 NTE31500.505.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 4-Shi-Li
3 E51500.505.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 2-Campbell-Campbell

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
10 9 5 4 2
Q J 7 6 2
A 9
8
7 6 3
K 10
J 5 4 3
K Q 6 5
N
WE
S
9 8 5 3
K Q 10 8 7 6
A 10 4
A K Q J 8
A 4
2
J 9 7 3 2

NS 5; NS 3; EW 4; NS 1N; E 1; Par +300: EW 6×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56504.501.503-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
4 S56504.501.505-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
5 S56504.501.507-Hu-Hu vs 7-Shi-Shi
5 S56504.501.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 1-Xiao-Xiao
3 S41702.004.002-Tang-Tang vs 4-Shi-Li
6 ×E−11001.005.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
6 S−11000.006.006-Stern-Pugh vs 5-Tivol-Tivol

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
10 9 6 5
K J 10 9
K
10 9 8 2
A J 7
Q 6 5 4
10 7 5 3
4 3
N
WE
S
8
8 7 3
A J 6
A K Q J 6 5
K Q 4 3 2
A 2
Q 9 8 4 2
7

NS 3; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−33006.000.007-Hu-Hu vs 7-Shi-Shi
4 E−22005.001.005-Gokcen-Gokcen vs 3-Geschke-Geschke
3 S31404.002.003-D'Arezzo-Swenson vs 6-Lipe-Lipe
2 W−11003.003.002-Tang-Tang vs 4-Shi-Li
3 S−1502.004.001-Rosenberg-Zuckerberg vs 2-Campbell-Campbell
3 E31100.505.506-Stern-Pugh vs 5-Tivol-Tivol
3 E31100.505.508-Ramji-Swaminathan vs 1-Xiao-Xiao